612-877-5000 | Contact us

Extranet Login

Publications

Prohibited Activity Under HIPAA


By Marcy R. Frost
February, 2003

Many employer sponsored health plans are "covered entities" under the privacy rules of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The following is a brief description of conduct prohibited by HIPAA for all covered entities.

Use or disclosure inconsistent with HIPAA: Covered entities may not use or disclose protected health information except as required or permitted by HIPAA.

Condition benefits on an authorization: Covered entities generally may not condition treatment, payment, enrollment or eligibility on the giving of an authorization.

Condition benefits on waiver: Covered entities may not condition treatment, payment, enrollment or eligibility on the giving of a waiver of HIPAA rights.

Use, disclose or request medical record: Covered entities may not use, disclose or request an entire medical record unless the entire medical record is necessary to fulfill the purpose of the use, disclosure or request.

Misuse of information: A health plan may not use or disclose protected health information received for the purpose of underwriting, premium rating, or other activities relating to the creation, renewal, or replacement of a contract of health insurance or health benefits for any other purpose if the health insurance is not placed with the health plan.

Retaliation: Covered entities may not retaliate against anyone for exercising HIPAA rights, opposing conduct believed in good faith to violate HIPAA, or participating in an investigation, compliance review, or hearing relating to HIPAA.

©Moss & Barnett, A Professional Association, 2003


Related

News Headlines


Case Summaries

Family Law

[02/02] Southerland v. City of New York
In a suit under 42 USC Section 1983 asserting that a New York City children's services caseworker entered the plaintiffs' home unlawfully and effected an unconstitutional removal of children into state custody, the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendant caseworker is: 1) affirmed with respect to the dismissal of the father's substantive due process claim; but 2) vacated with respect to the father's and his children's Fourth Amendment unlawful-search and Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claims and the children's unlawful-seizure claim, where the district court wrongfully concluded that the caseworker was entitled to qualified immunity with respect to all of the claims against him.

[02/02] Marriage of Walker
In a family court proceeding in which the recipient of a California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) disability allowance challenged earlier family court orders awarding a community property interest in the allowance to his former spouse, the family court's denial of the appellant's motion to set aside the earlier orders is reversed, where the family court erred as a matter of law in concluding that the recipient had made "no mistake" in agreeing that his spouse had a community property interest in his disability allowance and thus should not have denied his motion on this basis.

[02/02] Marriage of Wahl
On appeal from an order requiring an ex-wife to pay to her former husband $552,153.28 in attorney's fees and costs as a sanction because of her conduct with respect to two post-dissolution orders, the order is affirmed, where the record disclosed no abuse of discretion in the trial court's award, and additional sanctions are imposed against the appellant and her appellate attorneys on a finding that the appeal is frivolous.

[01/31] T.W. v. Superior Court (San Diego County Health and Human Servs. Agency)
In proceedings in mandate to review an order designating the specific placement of a dependent child after termination of parental rights, the petition is granted with directions, where the district court abused its discretion by denying a petition by the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency to remove the child from the home of his prospective adoptive parent, because the district court did not give appropriate weight to the legislature's goal of securing an adoptive home for a dependent child that is free from the influences of criminal activity and substance abuse.

More...


4800 WELLS FARGO CENTER | 90 South Seventh Street | Minneapolis, MN 55402-4129
P: 612-877-5000 F: 612-877-5999 Contact us