612-877-5000 | Contact us

Extranet Login

Current News

 New U.S. EPA "All Appropriate Inquiry" Regulations Apply To Real Property Transfers After November 1, 2006

As of November 1, 2006, any purchaser of real property who seeks to avoid potential environmental liability and qualify as an "innocent landowner" under federal environmental law must conduct a pre-purchase Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with new federal regulations. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's "All Appropriate Inquiry" regulations require a more detailed review of environmental conditions than had previously been required. The regulations direct a specialized inquiry into any past use of the subject and surrounding properties that may have resulted in soil or groundwater contamination. Moss & Barnett's Joseph Maternowski and other attorneys in the Environmental and Real Estate Departments  assist clients in applying the new regulations to pending real estate transactions.

Attachment: All Appropriate Inquiry Regulations 40 CFR 312

Related Articles:

Choosing an Environmental Consultant
(April 2003)

New Laws Encourage Development of Polluted Land
(March 2001)


Related

News Headlines


Case Summaries

Family Law

[02/02] Southerland v. City of New York
In a suit under 42 USC Section 1983 asserting that a New York City children's services caseworker entered the plaintiffs' home unlawfully and effected an unconstitutional removal of children into state custody, the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendant caseworker is: 1) affirmed with respect to the dismissal of the father's substantive due process claim; but 2) vacated with respect to the father's and his children's Fourth Amendment unlawful-search and Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claims and the children's unlawful-seizure claim, where the district court wrongfully concluded that the caseworker was entitled to qualified immunity with respect to all of the claims against him.

[02/02] Marriage of Walker
In a family court proceeding in which the recipient of a California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) disability allowance challenged earlier family court orders awarding a community property interest in the allowance to his former spouse, the family court's denial of the appellant's motion to set aside the earlier orders is reversed, where the family court erred as a matter of law in concluding that the recipient had made "no mistake" in agreeing that his spouse had a community property interest in his disability allowance and thus should not have denied his motion on this basis.

[02/02] Marriage of Wahl
On appeal from an order requiring an ex-wife to pay to her former husband $552,153.28 in attorney's fees and costs as a sanction because of her conduct with respect to two post-dissolution orders, the order is affirmed, where the record disclosed no abuse of discretion in the trial court's award, and additional sanctions are imposed against the appellant and her appellate attorneys on a finding that the appeal is frivolous.

[01/31] T.W. v. Superior Court (San Diego County Health and Human Servs. Agency)
In proceedings in mandate to review an order designating the specific placement of a dependent child after termination of parental rights, the petition is granted with directions, where the district court abused its discretion by denying a petition by the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency to remove the child from the home of his prospective adoptive parent, because the district court did not give appropriate weight to the legislature's goal of securing an adoptive home for a dependent child that is free from the influences of criminal activity and substance abuse.

More...


4800 WELLS FARGO CENTER | 90 South Seventh Street | Minneapolis, MN 55402-4129
P: 612-877-5000 F: 612-877-5999 Contact us